HomeAbout usPolicyProfessional DevelopmentTrainingEventsMembershipMedianavigationend

Earned Autonomy or Business as Usual?

Earned Autonomy thumbA conference for anyone engaged in Regulation or Business.
Monday 18 January 2010 – London

Overview

This one day conference examined working models for new approaches to regulation.

The government has established a programme of better regulation and regulators, with both local and national under scrutiny to ensure they adhere to Hampton principles. The LBRO is driving forward the formation of primary authorities. The main objective is to establish regulation that is proportionate and fair to business, particularly in a harsh economic climate.

Meanwhile many national (multi-site) businesses believe that they are still subject to inconsistent enforcement; they believe that businesses that can demonstrate high levels of compliance and performance should be able to earn a lighter regulatory touch by their local regulators. One of the desired outcomes is fewer inspections.

Is this reasonable and could it be made to work? Where does this leave the consumer?

CIEH brought together key members working in local government, national regulators and business to examine the issues and to design a model which recognises responsible compliance whilst still protecting the interests of consumers and acknowledging the principles of better regulation.

Outcome

The conference provided a unique opportunity to hear from leaders in this field together with leading opinion formers; there was also an opportunity to influence the debate and take part in shaping the response to calls from business, for regulators to recognise responsible compliance by multi-site businesses and adapt risk assessments accordingly.

The conference addressed key questions such as:

  • Earned autonomy – anathema or object of affection?
  • How light is light touch?
  • National businesses and SMEs – should they be treated the same?
  • Primary authorities – are they fit for purpose?
  • Regulators and business – are they competent?

Presentations: